Yesterday I went into some of the factors determining how the Model for IndieFilmFinanceV2011.1 may be set. If you were taking notes you probably recognized that these are the factors, but I thought it was worth jotting them down for our cheat sheets:
- Price point / negative cost below $5M;
- “Estimated” Foreign Value at 80% or higher of negative costs;
- Track record of collaborators in US Acquisition market to project 25% of negative costs;
- Utilization of Soft Money/Tax Benefits as revenue — not enhancement;
- Manufacture desire: inject freshness & an ability to cut through the noise;
- Predetermined & Accessible Audience;
- Aura Of Inevitability= Polished Script+Show Reel or Look Book + _________?
- Urgency of the deal;
- Something old (proven genre)
- Something new (fresh scent).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king."
2 comments:
In this information age, is there such a thing as a single "model" anyone could follow to ensure success?
I keep hearing "make it good," though there are many examples of fabulous films that don't get seen. And others, less so, that catch a viral wave and ride it on to their investor's glee.
It seems that paying attention to foreign distribution, keeping costs low and making a film that doesn't look like it should have been made for more money really helps. But can anyone say there is some combination of factors that amounts to a silver bullet? I am wary of anything so prescriptive.
It's too subjective a product we're producing, no?
That's funny. I was thinking almost the same thing, "What if one did the exact opposite from each of these 10 factors?"
Post a Comment